The global consumption of petroleum products has been on the rise with industrialization and globalization over the years. According to de Klerk, (2011)the world requires new productions in every three to four years that are equivalent to that of Saudi Arabia in order to maintain the ever growing supply. New discoveries are not proportional to consumption since 1986. The rate of production is falling at four percent per annum. This paper looks at Fischer-Tropsch technology which has been used in the creation of manufactured petroleum looking at its benefits, creation process and its applicability into the world economy.
Gas Oxidation Conversion
The Fischer-Tropsch is a catalyzed compound reaction at high pressure and temperatures in which hydrogen and carbon monoxide are changed over into fluid hydrocarbon of different structures. Average impetuses utilized are in view of cobalt and iron. The key motivation behind this procedure is to create a manufactured petroleum substitute for utilization as engineered oil or as engineered fuel. The Fischer-Tropsch, which is a three-stage blend (slurry process), is one of the most straightforward and most mechanically adaptable choices for handling of related petroleum gas into engine powers and results of the fundamental organic amalgamation is depicted. This process is divided into three main processes Syngas generation, Syngas Conversion, and Hydroprocessing (Klerk, 2011).
A synthesis gas is produced, and contains hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Natural gas is remade with oxygen, air or coal is turned into gas in the presence of either steam or oxygen. The gas through FT is changed into liquid hydrocarbons. The process can be manipulated to produce either heavier or lighter hydrocarbons. The outcome, waxy synthetic crude is advanced through the use of hydrocracking and isomerization procedures and divided into middle distillate fuels.
The procedure has the following benefits: a high return of the desired items because of a complete change of syngas; adaptability of the syngas source composition; simplicity of the hardware fabrication. Other benefits include operational unwavering quality of the gear and non-rigid operating conditions; a steady temperature control in the reactor; the absence of grating deterioration; a probability of constant substitution and rehashed recovery of the impetus; and dependable heat evacuation (Klerk, 2011).
The blend of hydrogen and carbon monoxide is called syngas or combination gas. The subsequent hydrocarbon items are refined to deliver the fancied manufactured fuel. The carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide is created by incomplete oxidation of wood and coal -based energies (Hoboken, 2007). The utility of the procedure is in its part in creating liquid hydrogen or hydrocarbon from a strong feedstock, for example, coal or carbon-containing residues of different sorts. Non-oxidation pyrolysis of the material generates syngas that can be utilized straightforwardly as a fuel without being taken through Fischer-Tropsch changes. On the off chance that liquid petroleum fuel, ointment, or wax is needed, the Fischer-Tropsch procedure can be connected(Dry, 2002).
Fig: FT process
Attention to FT technology has been on the rise. This can be attributed to new enhancements to the technology in addition to the understanding that it can be utilized in acquiring significance from stranded natural gas. In other terms, distantly traced natural gas can be changed to liquid hydrocarbon elements that can easily get into international markets. This is called the Gas-to-Liquids (GTL) market or industry. There is another approach of obtaining value from remote natural gas through the exploitation of established liquefied natural gas (LNG). The LNG industry has seen tremendous growth over the years and it is expected that the GTL industry will grow at a similar or greater pace. This will occur if it is shown on a commercial level that the economic incentives for utilizing GTL are superior as compared to LNG(van Steen & Claeys, 2008).
GTL process technology has innovative and positive technique for attaining energy diversity. There has been an increased interest in GTL over the past decade whereby researchers and corporations are showing great production economics. GTL fuel and companies are coming up developing countries. FT is a GTL chemical conversion procedure that is utilized to create gasoline and diesel fuel of high quality from coal, biomass feedstock’s in addition to natural gas(van Steen & Claeys, 2008).
The U.S. DOD is the leading world’s purchaser of fuel, devouring 8 billion gallons every year. The DOD and DOE have cooperated with Syntroleum Corporation to manufacture crude fluid F-T fuel from the natural gas and are further processed to make diesel and jet energizes. These very isomerized energizes straight chain branched alkanes and couple of alkenes, however, no aromatics or oxygenates. Syntroleum’s diesel fills have been motor tested and create no particulates or air toxins. Their plane fuel, blended 50:50 with conventional petroleum-inferred fuel, has as of late adequately been tried by the US Air Force B-52 plane with every one of the eight of its motors energized by the mixture(van Steen & Claeys, 2008).
Fig: Historical fuel consumption of the US DOD
Vast techno-economic studies on the deployment of FT technology have been carried in both third party and BP tasks around the world, which have affirmed its suitability to a wide range and size of commercial applications that include:
- Changingthenaturalgas to fluidfuels as a distinctoptionfortransportationsuch as Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and by pipeline. Theincorporation of FT, beingprimarilyparticular, can suitvariableplantsizes. It can be worked on a solitaryline of gasgeneration at sizes of up to 20,000 barrelseveryday (BPD) (restrictedjust by thebiggestaccessibleairdetachmentunitsneededforthe syngas area), with moresignificantlimitsachievable with differentparallelcombinationgaslines.
- Changing syngas from plenteous, remoteorcheapcoal (countingsubversivecoal gasification) into transportfuelsources through various FT lines.
- Changing biomass to renewable fluidfuelsandenergy at a size of 3-5,000 barrels per day (contingent upon feedstock gathering logistics) utilizingproper gasifiers together with FT process.
- Improvement of syngas producedusingrefinerybuildups into transportfuelconstituents (Noronha, et al., 2007).
This procedure is exceedingly applicable to aviation energy, where the high energy necessities of effective flight confine the energy storage alternatives accessible to aircraft. Weight is a noteworthy aircraft plan thought. All things considered, once the natural petroleum stores are depleted, engineered fuel will probably turn into the main practical avionics fuel because of its high energy density, not at all like the automobile business, which can utilize heavier battery innovation as energy and weight energy density is not a significant design element (Farias, et al., 2007).
The challenge of Fischer-Tropsch maintainability becomes possibly the most important factor when one imagines a world drained of its natural petroleum holds. In this world, electrical vitality can even now be created by means of non-carbon based sources (e.g. atomic, hydro, wind, sun based, and so forth.) which can be utilized to power the Fischer-Tropsch plants and the gasification or steam changing procedures. The major consumable of the procedure then turns into the beginning carbon sources, otherwise called feedstock. Along these lines, gave that energy is accessible to power the procedure, the manageability of engineered fuel creation through Fischer-Tropsch lays on the accessibility of feedstock(Markvoort, Van Santen, Hilbers, & Hensen, 2012).
The Fischer-Tropsch gas oxidation conversion process improved over decades and is a crucial component of a global energy strategy that will provide the United States with economic opportunities for cleaner and cheaper transport fuels while reducing the impact of human activity on our shared environment. Our research will describe the process of the gas oxidation conversion, operations and developments around the world and how this type of energy will benefit our global energy needs (Biello, 2015).
FT hydrocarbons have an array of benefits as compared to crude oil when it comes to the production of fuel such as absence of substances such as sulphur and nitrogen in addition to heavy metal contamination. FT has hydrocarbons have low aromatic element. Linear olefins that are necessary in the chemical industry can be created by the FT process or through dehydrogenation of paraffinic cuts(Zhang, Kang, & Wang, 2010).
FT plants have been a source de-carbonized power in the US substituting fossil fuels reducing the emission that come from stand-alone fossil fuels. Politically, FT has reinforced the operations of US department of defense. For instance, the fuel has as of late effectively been tried by the US Air Force B-52 planes with every one of the eight of its motors energized by the mixture (Biello, 2015). Environmentally, the process has also reduced the use of pollution fuels that are currently used in most parts of the world.
With the ever increasing growth on international fuel consumption and the ever depleting non-renewable natural resources, it is clear that a time is coming when fuel will be a preserve of a few. The environmental impact of using petroleum only is far much greater as compared to FT hydrocarbons which are cheaper and more environmental friendly. Much more should be done to increase the penetration of use of FT technology globally. An alternative source of fuel is important in a world whose fuel consumption is growing by the day while reserves are getting depleted in equal measures.
Political and cultural effects petroleum in America
There are numerous variables that impact on the formulation of United States energy policy making strategies. In this research study, it lays out an exhaustive depiction of the organizations that shape policies for US towards Central Asia generally. Furthermore, this section investigates the global situation, which has made the Federal Bureaucracy, the United States Congress, as well as other Interest Groups that constitute the energy policy. Raw petroleum has had significant effects on the world civilization than any natural resources in history. Oil has turned into an exceptionally unequivocal component in defining the politics, and diplomacy of states. The latter is a fact, adumbrated in public lectures known as ‘Oil in World Politics’ presented by a previous secretary of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), when he attested that everywhere throughout the world, the lives of individuals are influenced and the predetermination of countries are controlled by the aftereffect of oil exploration. (International Energy Agency, & SourceOECD, 2003)
Oil keeps the elements of the industrialized nations working and gives the incomes, which empower oil exporters to execute ambitions of national and financial development plans. The advancement would be hindered and life itself would be unbearably difficult to live in if the world is denied of oil. That is the reason oil has turned into the concern for governments, a crucial element of their political and a significant elements in the political as well as diplomatic methods. Subsequently there is a concern about the volatility of prices for raw petroleum that could bring about the increase in food prices. (Bloomberg, 2011). All through the 1980s before US encountered a noteworthy sorting out procedure, figuring out who ought to be engaged in energy policy making and designing what the hierarchical game plans for citizens would be. (United States, 1930) However, by 1985 the President of the time and the Congress had the capacity to achieve compromises on the fundamental issues confronting them following the start of the energy crisis. Having established decisions regarding these fundamental issues, the establishment of a steady national energy strategy framework gave off an impression of being set up. The simple policy framework that was set up by 1980 gave the structure some importance to oversee both the supply and demand for energy and in developing newer resources. (Darity, 2008)
It is essential to understand how the policy influenced by the Congress, Bureaucracy and interest groups would be of essence before going into the definite concentration on the role played by ‘iron triangle’ particularly towards Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. The decision-making aspect in Congress where the formulation of the law is done contrasts from that in bureaucracy, where it is executed. Indeed, the setting of an institution significantly impacts the approach outcome. First, in the case of not being sovereign, consideration for Congress is inevitable in the formulation of policies for national energy. The president has the power to oppose or mandate energy programs though he is normally checked by the Congress. Thus, the congress can enact on energy policy and raise the needed resources to underwrite it. The freedom accorded to the president to act autonomously of congress on energy issues is constrained seriously by law, custom or political circumstances. The formulation of Policies may be done by judges or managers by simply translating or executing a congressional enactment. However, making of policies by them is constrained by congressional rules as well as over shift. (United States, 1930)
Moreover, Congress is portrayed as the house that is divided and authority scattered between the two chambers. The members of the chamber are even torn by clashing claims for local as well as national interests. Despite the fact that congress is divided, it is apparent that there is an opportunity for strategy development on matters of petroleum and gas. In fact, the powers of the congress give it the mandate to be very clear that congress regularly reveals policies paralyzed as opposed to power practiced but rather power dissipated. The quantity of committees having petroleum energy as the main title increased during the 92nd Congress of 1970. The Senate customarily has fewer committees than the House. Normally, the committees are proposed by the desire of legislators to practice some power over major public matters.
As a result of bureaucracy, it is exceptionally challenging for the president to carry these diverse interests into accord with his own authoritative projects. To attain some success relies on his personality to a more prominent degree. The plans for the authoritative management by the White House are persistently obstructed by the political hindrances. In a bid to unite the bureaucracy, the president should always fight for the contending claims of organizations self-interest and the political pressures upon the agencies from Congress. The bureaucracy can be characterized as a plurality of institutional interests. They are constantly dynamic in forming the approaches that will be regulated by them. On the other hand, the quantity of interest parties endeavoring to present their will for government is very large. Among thousands of broadly composed interest parties in the United States, a big number is engaged in politics. When politically dynamic state and local groups are composed of the existing various interest parties, it gets to be evident that the parties are pervasive in the US legislative framework. They speak of practically every significant social group with a few cases of government.
The development of new groups is regularly provoked by the ascent of new issues on the legislative plan. Alternately, new issues on the plan usually reflect the developing political impact of new interests. The number of interest groups for national energy approach expanded essentially after the oil shock of 1973. Oil organizations make up the main interest groups regarding energy policy formulation. While conducting an analysis of the role played by oil organizations, it can be concluded that they are assuming the roles of non-governmental bodies. There is an addition of degree of assortment to the global political relationship. In some cases, they make the global relationships a little more complicated which may somehow have been truly amicable. However, the reality is that oil industries are fundamentally economic organizations. One of the qualities of the economic performers is that in as much as they can work sensibly well; they essentially acknowledge the aspects of the business as usual. There is no industry that can relinquish its profits for the purpose of political standards. Additionally, none of the oil business can turn down the possibility of creating essential new deposits. Obviously organizations must make a choice between conceivable endeavors. The political atmosphere of the nations in which these ventures are is the only of the components considered. The political strategies accessible to organizations for obtaining access to viable markets are limited. (International Energy Agency, & SourceOECD, 2003)
Due to the sheer size of the America’s market and the way that there was an oil industry already existing in America implied that the American oil organizations had no option but to assume a dominant role. As noted by analysts US does not have a history of noteworthy engagement with the Asian Region before 1990. Indeed due to the discovery of energy resources at the Caspian Sea made the area imperative for the America’s foreign policy.
Impacts of global politics
Over the previous century, present day society has built up the unquenchable desire for oil and follows 100 years of research and experimentation with still no dependable substitution. Oil is Power! It is not just energy as perceived by many. Here, power means being an essential figure in the process of affirming and keeping up political predominance and control. Oil is important for growing food, building infrastructure, advancing technological innovation, manufacture of products and transporting them to market. It greases up the systems of both national and international politics. The individuals, who can reliably get their hands on the most oil, at the best costs, definitely rule! What makes oil so exceedingly profitable that people, organizations, and sovereign states would really be willing to go to war if important, with a specific end goal, to safeguard or fight to win. First and foremost, Oil is Universal in that it is a staple component of exceptional human presence! It assumes a noteworthy role in for all intents and purposes every part of our lives from innovations to the very businesses and foods fundamental for human existence.
Secondly, Oil is a unique product. While there could be different options for energy supply accessible for industrial undertakings, for example, the creation of electricity, there is presently no sensible substitute for oil concerning transportation. Thirdly, Oil is a rare commodity to find. According to scientist’s calculations, oil is a dynamically depleting fuel that is vanishing at an exponentially disturbing rate. Though there is still an undetermined number of rich, undiscovered oil stores left to be found the world over, sensible contentions will proceed as to exactly how rapidly the world’s oil supply may run out. However, even amongst the most hopeful or otherwise prognosticators, there is basically no argument that there is at present less oil accessible to us than there was only half a decade back. . (United States, 2004)
Recent years around the 1900s, coal represented about 55 percent of the whole world’s energy utilization while petroleum and natural gasses contribute to about 3 percent of the world’s energy. After one century, coal accounted for just 25 percent of the planet’s energy while at the same time natural gas rose to 23 percent with oil ruling at below 40 percent. In 2000, the demanding oil was more or less 75 million barrels every day. In less than ten years later, the International Energy Agency (IEA) now ascertains that our worldwide hunger for crude petroleum will be double by the year 2030. Planes and vehicles all depend on oil. Whether it’s driving the children to school, haul for foodstuff and products to markets or fueling a warship, tank, rocket launcher or fighter jet all in the battle zones. The same rule applies, those who have oil usually succeed and the individuals, who don’t, lose! So there is nothing unexpected exactly how much global, geopolitical concern and conflicts could emerge in regards to oil and the organizations that supply it around the world. Throughout the years there has been witnessed various rows being raised on the global scene, some just growing into showdowns controlled by ‘quid pro quo’ understandings while others have prompted boycotts, United Nations reprimands and sometimes intrusions and full-scale wars!
According to the Effects of Oil on Cultures special issue in the ‘Journal of American Studies’ follows the expansive field of social representations and typical structures that have come to design around the fugacious products of petroleum in the 150 years since the initiation of the U.S. petroleum industry. Running from Hollywood film and corporate workmanship to World War II propaganda and aquarium shows, the oil culture representations as examined indicating the complicated role played by American society in setting up and challenging oil’s status (Darity, 2008). It is also the basic product supporting present day financial expansion and a crucial force for the social and political life. By tending to the ascent of oil as a social power, this issue expects to fill a critical gap in oil grants and to intercede in what has turned into an epochal and very charged moments within the historical records of petrol-capitalism. (Darity, 2008)
During the reign of the industry’s sesquicentennial and the deep watered Horizon oil spillage, it’s a very devastating ecological catastrophe of the twenty-first century to date. It could be possibly the right time to track and reconsider the practices, developments, and conflicts that made the predominance of oil capitalism conceivable. Though much work is being committed to track the materials as well as political procedures that energized the development of the petroleum business, generally little grant has endeavored to account for the myriad methods in which oil saturates America aesthetic practices, social structures, and public discourses. Investigating the fruitful roles of oil in the cultural creative energy, the research shows new strategies for comprehension of a focal paradox of oil history: how characteristic material comprehended from its start to be nonrenewable and was dangerously grasped through the span of the nineteenth and twentieth century and is a reality of regular American experience. In the meantime, by dissecting the ambiguities, loopholes, and inconsistencies that have caused the cultural representations of oil, the benefactors uncover a background marked by struggles and uncertainty which could illuminate continuous endeavors to ‘see past’ oil capitalism and imagine alternate methods of energy creation and utilization.
Also, as oil costs rise, so does the interest in biofuels, which are the main non-fossil fluid power ready to supplant petroleum items in existing combustion motors and engine vehicles. This is despite biofuels being frequently produced using corn and other horticultural items. Even as demand for these alternate means of fuel expands, the product costs are constrained upwards, making food not easily affordable. Export driven agricultural techniques likewise boost the world’s inevitability to high oil costs. The majority of donor organizations have energized the less industrialized nations to concentrate on the production of cash crops which is at the expense of the staple food for local use. Therefore, individuals in these nations are compelled to depend progressively on imports of regularly subsidized cereals and those supported food aided programs. On the other hand, the increasing cost of transport adds to rising costs of foods imports, hence making them not easily available. The cost of fuel is a representation of as much as 60 percent of aggregate shipping operations expense. Since mid-2007 to 2008, due to increased fuel costs, equally there was an increase in transportation cost for food aid having risen to about $50 in every ton. According to the United States Agency for International Development, this represented about a 30 percent in total increase.
Contaminants derived from Petroleum usually constitute a standout amongst the most predominant sources of ecological degradation in the industrialized world. With the high amount of concentration, the hydrocarbon atoms that make up unrefined petroleum and petroleum items are very harmful to numerous organic entities, including people. Petroleum likewise has trace substances of sulfur and nitrogen compounds, which are very dangerous and reacts with the environment to create auxiliary toxic chemicals (United States, 2004). The dominance levels of products derived from petroleum, in America and the global economy, facilitates the conditions for conveying a lot of these poisons into populated zones and biological communities around the world. (United States, 2004)
Maybe the most noticeable source of petroleum pollution can be attributed to oil tanker accidents such as that in Prince William in Alaska and was known as the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill. The latter hit headlines with crippling pictures of oil coated shorelines and dead birds and ocean creatures. In most cases, such spills happen amid the transportation of unrefined petroleum to importing countries. Unrefined petroleum goes for long distances by either sea tanker or pipeline, and both techniques are inclined to accidents. Oil might likewise spill at the site where it is extracted as on blowout like the Ixtoc well in 1979. A blowout is one of the significant dangers of drilling for oil and could happen when gas traps in the deposit and at high pressures that oil all of sudden ejects out of the drill shaft in a spring. (Alaska Geographic Society, 1993)
The accidents from tankers, pipelines, and wells discharge gigantic amounts of petroleum into zones and marine environments in a concentrated form. The environmental effects of vast spills like these have just been considered for few cases, and it is impractical to say which have been the most naturally harm-causing accidents as recorded in history. An expansive oil spill in the open seas may do less harm to marine life forms than little spill close to the shoreline. For instance, the Exxon Valdez catastrophe made an immense environment calamity, not because of the amount of oil spilt but due to the measure of shoreline affected, sensitivity of creatures in the zone, and the physical qualities of Prince William, that served to intensify the harm (Alaska Geographic Society, 1993). The Exxon Valdez disaster was the beginning of the most extensive and expensive cleanup endeavor ever done and pointed out more public oil mishaps than any other time in history. There has been ongoing scientific research on the impacts of oil in Prince William Sound and consequently the number of tanker accidents globally has diminished altogether since the season of the Valdez spill. This is because of stricter regulations and such obliged changes in the design of vessels as double construction. (Alaska Geographic Society, 1993)
Alaska Geographic Society. (1993). Prince William Sound. Anchorage, AK: Author.
Darity, W. A. (2008). International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.
International Energy Agency, & SourceOECD (Online service). (2003). Switzerland 2003 review. Paris: OECD/IEA.
United States. (2004). Oilspill in Prince William Sound, Alaska: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Environmental Protection of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States, One Hundred First Congress, first session, on the adequacy and effectiveness of the oilspill cleanup in Prince William Sound, Alaska, April 19, 1989. Washington: U.S. G.P.O.
United States, & United States. (1930). Foreign relations between Latin America and the Caribbean States.
Biello, D. (2015). Flame Off: Turning Natural Gas Pollution into Gasoline. Scientificamerican.com. Retrieved 16 May, 2015, from <http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/turning-natural-gas-pollution-into-gasoline/>
Farias, F., Silva, F., Cartaxo, S., Fernandes, F., & Sales, F. (2007). Effect of operating conditions on Fischer-Tropsch liquid products. Latin American Applied Research, 37(4), 283-287. Retrieved from 16 May, 2015 <http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0327-07932007000400009>
Hoboken, NJ (2007). Fischer-Tropsch process. In Hawley’s condensed chemical dictionary. Wiley: Print.
Top of Form
Klerk, A. (2011). Fischer-Tropsch refining. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
Top of Form
Natural Gas Conversion Symposium, Noronha, F. B., Schmal, M., & Sousa-Aguiar, E. F. (2007). Natural gas conversion VIII: Proceedings of the 8th Natural Gas Conversion Symposium, Natal, Brazil, May 27-31, 2007. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
De Klerk, A. (2011). Fischer-Tropsch Refining. Fischer-Tropsch Refining. doi:10.1002/9783527635603
Dry, M. E. (2002). The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950-2000. In Catalysis Today (Vol. 71, pp. 227–241). doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(01)00453-9
Markvoort, A. J., Van Santen, R. A., Hilbers, P. A. J., & Hensen, E. J. M. (2012). Kinetics of the Fischer-Tropsch reaction. Angewandte Chemie – International Edition, 51, 9015–9019. doi:10.1002/anie.201203282
Van Steen, E., & Claeys, M. (2008). Fischer-Tropsch Catalysts for the Biomass-to-Liquid (BTL)-Process. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 31, 655–666. doi:10.1002/ceat.200800067
Zhang, Q., Kang, J., & Wang, Y. (2010). Development of Novel Catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis: Tuning the Product Selectivity. ChemCatChem. doi:10.1002/cctc.201000071
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form